AbstractsFluidized sand-bed, fixed-film denitrifying reactors were tested for the treatment of high strength waters and for the optimization and control of biofilm thickness. Two reactors with sand (0.63 - 0.8 mm) as the carrier particle were operated. Ethanol and propionic acid were used as carbon sources. Nitrate concentrations were in the range of 200-900 mg NO3--N/l. Tests showed no substrate inhibition (NO3- or ethanol) at these concentrations (Fig. 3). The nitrate removal capacity of the reactors reached 10 kg NO3--N/m3d, which corresponded practically to 100 % nitrate removal efficiency (Fig. 2). Nitrite formation was only observable where other conditions (e.g., unfavourable pH) hindered nitrate removal (Fig. 4). Since biofilm growth is a parameter of major influence on
reactor performance and mechanical/hydrodynamic functioning, its control is
indispensable. A method was developed for simplified determination and optimization
of biofilm coverage. This method is based on the expansion coefficient (E)
and specific particle volume ( The particle content (Cp) (Fig. 1, eqs. 2 and 6)
ties these parameters to the pressure gradient measured along a fluidized bed,
as introduced in a previous study (Csikor et al. 1995). This method was simplified
to replace biofilm thickness with the gravimetric biofilm coverage (G), which
is easy to determine gravimetrically. For the determination of fluidization
and biofilm parameters, samples were taken from different points of the fluidized
bed with differing biofilm thickness (Fig.6) and tested in a small fluidized
bed reactor. It was found that G is linearly correlated to E and It was shown that differences in microbial cultures cause negligible differences in the hydrodynamics of fluidization (Fig. 5). Volumetric biomass concentration (X), which is directly related to G (Fig. 7), can thus be determined using simple hydrostatic pressure tests. It was demonstrated that X has an optimal value (Figs. 7 and 11) and can reach 19 - 20 g VS/l under normal operating conditions. This corresponds to a G between 80 - 100 mg VS/g support. Increased biofilm thickness does not improve X but increases the diffusion limitation. The sensitivity of the Cp-based biofilm measurement is greater with thin biofilms. However the real volumetric biomass concentration is less sensitive to changes with thick biofilms, which counterbalances this effect (Fig. 10). KeywordsFluidized bed, biofilm, denitrification, optimization. Corresponding author Zs. Csikor, Environmental Pilot Laboratory, Budapesti Mûszaki és
Gazdaságtudományi Egyetem [Budapest University of Technology and
Economics], H-1521 Budapest, Muegyetem rkp. 9., HONGRIE | |||
|